Property Should Not Be Confused With Income

null Jan. 4, 2024 4:39 pm ETThe U.S. Supreme Court in Washington, Jan. 4. Photo: Drew Angerer/Getty ImagesMoore v. United States, argued in December, is the most important Supreme Court tax case in a century (“The Supreme Court and a Wealth Tax,” Review & Outlook, Dec. 6). One issue raised by the government for the first time during oral argument deserves additional attention.Although the Moores received no distributions on their stock, they were taxed in 2017 on a fictitious distribution of property from a foreign corporation. Their argument: We realized no income, as required by the 16th Amendment. At oral argument, the Solicitor General suggested the case might be decided by holding that a corporation’s realized income may be “attributed” to shareholders, but, as Justice Neil Gorsuch noted, none of the government’s briefs in any forum ever made that point. Copyright ©2024 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8Sponsored OffersTurboTax: Up to

A person who loves writing, loves novels, and loves life.Seeking objective truth, hoping for world peace, and wishing for a world without wars.

Opinion Jan 5, 2024 Add to Reading List

Property Should Not Be Confused With Income

null

Jan. 4, 2024 4:39 pm ET

The U.S. Supreme Court in Washington, Jan. 4. Photo: Drew Angerer/Getty Images

Moore v. United States, argued in December, is the most important Supreme Court tax case in a century (“The Supreme Court and a Wealth Tax,” Review & Outlook, Dec. 6). One issue raised by the government for the first time during oral argument deserves additional attention.

Although the Moores received no distributions on their stock, they were taxed in 2017 on a fictitious distribution of property from a foreign corporation. Their argument: We realized no income, as required by the 16th Amendment. At oral argument, the Solicitor General suggested the case might be decided by holding that a corporation’s realized income may be “attributed” to shareholders, but, as Justice Neil Gorsuch noted, none of the government’s briefs in any forum ever made that point.