[Health] Serving-size labelling leaves many confused- Which? survey

Image source, Getty ImagesBy Smitha MundasadHealth reporter People struggle to estimate portion sizes for food such as chocolate, crisps and cheese, a survey of 1,265 Which? subscribers suggests.They may need more help to assess how healthy products are, the consumer group says.A third guessed a 185g (6.5oz) tube of Pringles contained two to four portions. But the packaging says it has six to seven - some 13 crisps each.On a 220g box of Quality Street, the label suggests a portion is two sweets.Unrealistic recommended serving sizes can mislead people into thinking they are consuming fewer calories, and less fat, sugar or salt, than they actually are, Which? says.This video can not be playedTo play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.Media caption, Measure food with your fistsLabelling was really valuable but needed to be based on "meaningful and consistent" portion sizes, Which? nutritionist Shefalee Loth said."People can be confused by inconsistent and unrealistic

A person who loves writing, loves novels, and loves life.Seeking objective truth, hoping for world peace, and wishing for a world without wars.
[Health] Serving-size labelling leaves many confused- Which? survey
picture of someone eating crispsImage source, Getty Images

People struggle to estimate portion sizes for food such as chocolate, crisps and cheese, a survey of 1,265 Which? subscribers suggests.

They may need more help to assess how healthy products are, the consumer group says.

A third guessed a 185g (6.5oz) tube of Pringles contained two to four portions. But the packaging says it has six to seven - some 13 crisps each.

On a 220g box of Quality Street, the label suggests a portion is two sweets.

Unrealistic recommended serving sizes can mislead people into thinking they are consuming fewer calories, and less fat, sugar or salt, than they actually are, Which? says.

This video can not be played

To play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.

Media caption,

Measure food with your fists

Labelling was really valuable but needed to be based on "meaningful and consistent" portion sizes, Which? nutritionist Shefalee Loth said.

"People can be confused by inconsistent and unrealistic serving sizes and the way that manufacturers provide these can sometimes make it difficult to assess just how healthy a product is," she said.

Most of those surveyed said:

  • supermarket "meal deals" were the ideal portion size for one person - but the drink and accompanying snack are often designed for two, a 300ml (half a pint) carton of orange juice, for example, or a 60g packet of mixed nuts
  • a 225g supermarket pack of halloumi cheese was the right amount for two to four people - but the packaging suggests it would be enough to feed seven

The Which? report found some well-known brands of crisps and chocolate were available in a range of pack sizes, with inconsistent portion sizes across these different packs.

snacks in bowlsImage source, Getty Images

Which? asked 229 people to pour themselves a glass of wine or juice at home and then measure how much they had served.

A Food and Drink Federation representative said a range of portion sizes were available "to help consumers achieve a healthy balanced diet and to meet the varying requirements of families".

"Food and drink manufacturers are committed to providing clear and accurate information and voluntarily include traffic-light labelling on the front of packs, so people can make an informed decision on the food they buy," the representative added.

Most nutrition information on packaging is listed per 100g, in line with government guidance.

Related Topics

What's Your Reaction?

like

dislike

love

funny

angry

sad

wow